Sudarium of Oviedo. Among the many features to be added in the near future (and which may well be available by the time the newsletter is sent out) are full interviews with Bruno Barberis from the

Sudarium of Oviedo was filmed, edited and aired on Channel Four between the last edition of the newsletter and this one. I have included a couple of reviews of the documentary in this edition, along

privileged to have Mark Guscin as our guide in Shroud and Sudarium studies – and how to get into the Shroud museum without too long a wait (twice). After two days to get acclimatised to Italy and

book also includes a complete chapter on the Sudarium of Oviedo and how its known age is further proof of the Shroud’s own antiquity. A good example of the book’s objectivity is the treatment of

and the possible correlation of the Shroud with the Sudarium of Oviedo, will outweigh the suggestions I have made above. There is also the possibility that the Shroud is the result of a genuine miracle,

exist: The Shroud of Turin and the Sudarium of Oviedo. Carbon dating suggests the the Shroud is less than 1,000 years old. Other findings suggest it is much older. What is the truth? And can it tell

and the Sudarium of Oviedo. It is intended that there will also be time for questions and discussion, the lack of which many felt was a detriment to the previous conference in St Louis, Missouri in

Sudarium of Oviedo but without too much detail. The analysis of the Shroud includes photography, the bloodstains (denying McCrone’s claims, if anyone even remembers them at this stage), the image

New Discoveries on the Sudarium of Oviedo.” This was followed by two papers about the Mandylion and the Shroud from researchers Sébastien Cataldo of France and Ivan Polverari of Italy. The day ended

Juan Miñarro thinks he has conclusively matched the Sudarium of Oviedo to the Shroud of Turin, which, if true, would be a definite argument against the 14th century origin of the Shroud found by the