The 14C radiodating of 1988 could be conditioned by the resurrection: the protonic and neutronic radiation, that would have caused the image, would have also varied the percentage of carbon and azote

Following the radiocarbon dating result of 1988 there has been a cluster of new ideas and new hypotheses on the formation of the Shroud's image. Mark Antonacci has painstakingly examined all the serious

Kitty Little? For the explanation of how the carbon dating may be right - if it is right - should we be looking to the argument advanced by Dr. Walter McCrone? Or Professor Randall Bresee and Emily

thus altering its dating, and others believe in the existence of a biological complex of fungi and bacteria covering the yarns of the TS in a patina (Moroni 1997, Garza Valdes 2001). Recently it was

translators kindly offered to translate into Russian the 1988 radiocarbon dating paper that was published in Nature and is reprinted on our website. I explained to her that while we appreciated the offer,

of Ray Rogers regarding the anomalous nature of the 1988 radiocarbon dating sample. Charles Mader was kind enough to send me his obituary from the Thursday, March 22, 2018 edition of the Los Alamos Daily

for instance, the carbon-14 test were to date the Shroud to the ninth or tenth century after Christ. I have lived to see renowned men of science, medical men and art experts stand in awe before the

in order to argue against the 1988 dating of the Shroud. There is no discussion of nuclear cross sections or probabilities of reaction in the book. There is no presentation of real elemental analyses

It is widely known that in 1988 spokesmen for three different laboratories jointly announced that the measurements of C 14 applied to samples from the Turin cloth indicated its age as corresponding

Tony Fleming As commonly known, the Shroud was carbon dated by three independent laboratories and the results announced to the world in 1988. It was a shock to many that the date was scientifically measured