Weinstein, G.A. and H.N. Michael. 1978 Radiocarbon dates from Akrotiri, Thera. Archaeometry 20(2):203-209 Wild, Robert A., S.J. 1984. The Shroud of Turin: probably the work of a 14th century artist

JUNE 2015 PAGE 35 BRITISH SOCIETY FOR THE TURIN SHROUD NEWSLETTER 81 secret radiocarbon dating before the 1988 one, and some ‘Vatican’ responses to the radiocarbon reliability. “Colin Berry:

Textile Evidence Supports Skewed Radiocarbon Date of Shroud of Turin, http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/textevid.pdf, 2002. 3. Meacham, William. Thoughts on the Shroud 14C Debate. In The Turin Shroud: past,

radiocarbon sample was not part of the original cloth of the Shroud of Turin. The radiocarbon date was thus not valid for determining the true age of the Shroud”. If Rogers is right (which will not

Note, they accept the validity of the reported radiocarbon date. 6 In “Turin Shroud”, Picknett and Prince (53), assign the image on the Shroud to Leonardo. They propose a photochemical mechanism

nuclear physicist credited with developing the AMS radiocarbon dating method used in 1988 to test samples from the Shroud of Turin, on February 18, 2009. Dr. Gove authored a book titled, Relic, Icon or

original cloth of the Shroud of Turin. The radiocarbon date was thus not valid for determining the true age of the Shroud.” Skeptics, and even those otherwise convinced of the Shroud’s authenticity,

Piltdown Man fraud and for his participation in the radiocarbon dating of the Turin Shroud in 1988, died at the age of 77 on August 20, 2001. The following excerpts are from an article by Pearce Wright

and perhaps even the debunkers to the fact that the Shroud of Turin has not yet been satisfactorily radiocarbon dated. Entry: #25 Date: 2005 Data Category: C-14 aspects Evidence: Meacham cites

23 Damon, P. E., et al. (1989). Radiocarbon Dating of the Shroud of Turin. Nature 337: 6208: 611–615. 24 Fernández, J. (2015) Faith and science dialogue in the Shroud of Turin, Scientia et Fides,