-
than any in the horotelic distribution as calculated from fossil records of extinct taxonomic units, only. Further studies show that these extremely low rates are part of a statistical excess of low rates in general in comparison
-
transitions are often found in the fossil record. Preserved transitions are not commonand should not be, according to our understanding of evolution (see next section) but they are not entirely wanting, as creationists
-
us each to apply a subject of evolutionary theory to the fossil record. He assigned me "speciation." I replied that I didn't know anything useful about speciation and would rather do "morphology" or "rates of change." He
-
the punctuated changes in the fossil record are said to occur via 'species selection,' in which descendant species rapidly supplant their ancestors"a statement they attribute to Santiago F. Elena et al. (Reports, 21 June
-
description dispels this final impediment and establishes the fossil record as a chronology for an immensely long history of life. The gradual and progressive triumph of objective observation over social and ideological
-
In the fossil record, species often appear suddenly, hang on relatively unchanged for millions of years, and then vanish. Darwin had pointed out that when it comes to the past life of this planet, fossils are pebbles from
-
lamented reasons based on the extreme spottiness of the fossil record. Some splendid cases began to accumulate in years following the Origin of Species, most notably the discovery of Archaeopteryx, an initial bird chock-
-
was a consequence of the notorious incompleteness of the fossil record. The so-called evolutionary species definition adopted by most paleontologists (Simpson, 1961; Wilimann, 1985) reflects the same focus on the vertical
-
contributions in theoretical and quantitative analysis of the fossil record and evolutionary history. Recognizing that an ideological agenda was not en- ough, Gould and others developed and promoted new outlets, technologies,
-
either still living or in the fossil record, were very rare or absent. The gene-frequency approach of population genetics was quite unable to supply any solution to this problem of origination. The second reason for
-
complexity manifest in the living world and evinced by the fossil record. Gould announces that he has something important to contribute to each branch of Darwinian logic. These contributions are buttressed by ‘‘new
-
hidden only because of the incompleteness of the fossil record, is quite mistaken. The fossil record is not so very inadequate, and in any case there is theoretical reason to think that evolution will be jerky rather than
-
than any in the horotelic distribution as calculated from fossil records of extinct taxonomic units, only. Further studies show that these extremely low rates are part of a statistical excess of low rates in general in comparison
-
was a consequence of the notorious incompleteness of the fossil record. The so-called evolutionary species definition adopted by most paleontologists (Simpson, 1961; Wilimann, 1985) reflects the same focus on the vertical
-
Darwinian processes should yield exactly what we see in the fossil record. It is gradualism that we must reject, not Darwinism. [ ] Eldredge and I believe that speciation is responsible for almost all evolutionary change.
-
The fossil record suggests that macroevolution is indeed gradual, paced at a rate that leads to the conclusion that it is based upon hundreds or thousands of gene substitutions no different in kind from the ones examined
-
Darwinian processes should yield exactly what we see in the fossil record. It is gradualism that we must reject, not Darwinism. [ ] Eldredge and I believe that speciation is responsible for almost all evolutionary change.
-
have been helpful to itevidence from the then meager fossil record and knowledge of the mechanism of inheritance. The endurance of a theory so conceivedalmost from first principleshas excited the admiration of generations
-
We may consider the fossil record of plants in its bearing: I. on the truth of the doctrine of Evolution; II. on Phylogeny, or the course of Evolution; III. on the theory of Natural Selection. The remarks which follow, illustrating
-
paleontology and had spent years interpreting the rich fossil record of the Burgess Shale in western Canada. But Stephen Jay Gould determined that Walcott had got it all wrong with the Burgess Shale. The fossil record did